Loading…

Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa

Pouch of Douglas obliteration, which prevents exteriorization of the uterus, increases surgical morbidity in patients with placenta previa. We aimed to identify magnetic resonance imaging features that can predict pouch of Douglas obliteration preoperatively. We retrospectively assessed 39 women wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290244-e0290244
Main Authors: Shinohara, Satoshi, Kasai, Mayuko, Yasuda, Genki, Sunami, Rei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-b0d5b24005510419b3d46302a15737177722329c7b16e0807e5af93069dd199a3
container_end_page e0290244
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0290244
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Shinohara, Satoshi
Kasai, Mayuko
Yasuda, Genki
Sunami, Rei
description Pouch of Douglas obliteration, which prevents exteriorization of the uterus, increases surgical morbidity in patients with placenta previa. We aimed to identify magnetic resonance imaging features that can predict pouch of Douglas obliteration preoperatively. We retrospectively assessed 39 women with posterior placenta previa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative assessment of placenta accreta spectrum. We defined the angle formed by the anatomical conjugate line (based on pelvimetry) and the cervical canal as the cervical inclination angle, which was measured on sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical inclination angle and pouch of Douglas obliteration. The median maternal age was 34 years (range, 22-44 years) and 26 (66.7%) women delivered at term. The median cervical inclination angle was 98° (range, 71-128). Pouch of Douglas obliteration was confirmed in six patients (15.4%). The cut-off value of the cervical inclination angle for the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration was 102° with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 78.8%, positive predictive value of 36.4%, and negative predictive value of 92.9% (area under the curve, 0.83). Measuring the cervical inclination angle may help in ruling out an obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. It may also be useful in the operative management of women with posterior placenta previa. However, caution should be exercised when generalizing the results of this study because of the small sample size, which makes the results prone to bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0290244
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2852599679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A761278744</galeid><sourcerecordid>A761278744</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-b0d5b24005510419b3d46302a15737177722329c7b16e0807e5af93069dd199a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRsFb_gWBAEL3YNR8zk82VlPpVKBTUehsymTMzKdlkTDJb-5P8l2a6o3SlF5KLhHOevOfk5C2K5wSvCePk7ZWfglN2PXoHa0wFpmX5oDgigtFVTTF7eOf8uHgS4xXGFdvU9VHx6zIZa9IN8h1KAyDleguogXQN4G4jGsLOaGWRVrlGBtoFVMlv9wnvrqZeJUDWOECdD2gM0BqdjOvR6Cc9zPLv_dRbFZFvckEIKhnvkHFozCdwKaJrk4aMx5w0s4ZVOsfVLLYz6mnxqFM2wrNlPy4uP374dvp5dX7x6ez05Hylq4qlVYPbqqFlfmBFcElEw9qyZpgqUvE8K845pYwKzRtSA95gDpXqBMO1aFsihGLHxYu97mh9lMtoo6SbilZC1Fxk4t1CTM0W2rnJoKwcg9mqcCO9MvIw48wge7-TuSFWbmqaFV4vCsH_mCAmuTVRg7XKgZ9uizGRWcEy-vIf9P6WFqpXFqRxnc-F9SwqT3hNKN_wsszU-h4qrxbyT2bzdCbHDy68ObiQmQQ_U6-mGOXZ1y__z158P2Rf3WEHUDYN0dtptkQ8BMs9qIOPMUD3d8oEy9n7f6YhZ-_LxfvsN7UU-SI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2852599679</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Shinohara, Satoshi ; Kasai, Mayuko ; Yasuda, Genki ; Sunami, Rei</creator><contributor>Naem, Antoine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, Satoshi ; Kasai, Mayuko ; Yasuda, Genki ; Sunami, Rei ; Naem, Antoine</creatorcontrib><description>Pouch of Douglas obliteration, which prevents exteriorization of the uterus, increases surgical morbidity in patients with placenta previa. We aimed to identify magnetic resonance imaging features that can predict pouch of Douglas obliteration preoperatively. We retrospectively assessed 39 women with posterior placenta previa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative assessment of placenta accreta spectrum. We defined the angle formed by the anatomical conjugate line (based on pelvimetry) and the cervical canal as the cervical inclination angle, which was measured on sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical inclination angle and pouch of Douglas obliteration. The median maternal age was 34 years (range, 22-44 years) and 26 (66.7%) women delivered at term. The median cervical inclination angle was 98° (range, 71-128). Pouch of Douglas obliteration was confirmed in six patients (15.4%). The cut-off value of the cervical inclination angle for the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration was 102° with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 78.8%, positive predictive value of 36.4%, and negative predictive value of 92.9% (area under the curve, 0.83). Measuring the cervical inclination angle may help in ruling out an obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. It may also be useful in the operative management of women with posterior placenta previa. However, caution should be exercised when generalizing the results of this study because of the small sample size, which makes the results prone to bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290244</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Biology and Life Sciences ; Canals (anatomy) ; Cervix ; Cesarean section ; Conjugates ; Diagnosis ; Endometriosis ; Gestational age ; Glucose ; Government agencies ; Health aspects ; Hospitals ; Inclination angle ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mann-Whitney U test ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Medicine, Experimental ; Morbidity ; Patients ; Placenta ; Placenta praevia ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy complications ; Pregnant women ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Risk factors ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Uterus</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290244-e0290244</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2023 Shinohara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 Shinohara et al 2023 Shinohara et al</rights><rights>2023 Shinohara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-b0d5b24005510419b3d46302a15737177722329c7b16e0807e5af93069dd199a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8508-1097 ; 0000-0003-3124-1141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2852599679/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2852599679?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,25783,27957,27958,37047,37048,44625,53827,53829,75483</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Naem, Antoine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Genki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunami, Rei</creatorcontrib><title>Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Pouch of Douglas obliteration, which prevents exteriorization of the uterus, increases surgical morbidity in patients with placenta previa. We aimed to identify magnetic resonance imaging features that can predict pouch of Douglas obliteration preoperatively. We retrospectively assessed 39 women with posterior placenta previa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative assessment of placenta accreta spectrum. We defined the angle formed by the anatomical conjugate line (based on pelvimetry) and the cervical canal as the cervical inclination angle, which was measured on sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical inclination angle and pouch of Douglas obliteration. The median maternal age was 34 years (range, 22-44 years) and 26 (66.7%) women delivered at term. The median cervical inclination angle was 98° (range, 71-128). Pouch of Douglas obliteration was confirmed in six patients (15.4%). The cut-off value of the cervical inclination angle for the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration was 102° with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 78.8%, positive predictive value of 36.4%, and negative predictive value of 92.9% (area under the curve, 0.83). Measuring the cervical inclination angle may help in ruling out an obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. It may also be useful in the operative management of women with posterior placenta previa. However, caution should be exercised when generalizing the results of this study because of the small sample size, which makes the results prone to bias.</description><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Canals (anatomy)</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Cesarean section</subject><subject>Conjugates</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Endometriosis</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mann-Whitney U test</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Placenta</subject><subject>Placenta praevia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Uterus</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl1rFDEUhgdRsFb_gWBAEL3YNR8zk82VlPpVKBTUehsymTMzKdlkTDJb-5P8l2a6o3SlF5KLhHOevOfk5C2K5wSvCePk7ZWfglN2PXoHa0wFpmX5oDgigtFVTTF7eOf8uHgS4xXGFdvU9VHx6zIZa9IN8h1KAyDleguogXQN4G4jGsLOaGWRVrlGBtoFVMlv9wnvrqZeJUDWOECdD2gM0BqdjOvR6Cc9zPLv_dRbFZFvckEIKhnvkHFozCdwKaJrk4aMx5w0s4ZVOsfVLLYz6mnxqFM2wrNlPy4uP374dvp5dX7x6ez05Hylq4qlVYPbqqFlfmBFcElEw9qyZpgqUvE8K845pYwKzRtSA95gDpXqBMO1aFsihGLHxYu97mh9lMtoo6SbilZC1Fxk4t1CTM0W2rnJoKwcg9mqcCO9MvIw48wge7-TuSFWbmqaFV4vCsH_mCAmuTVRg7XKgZ9uizGRWcEy-vIf9P6WFqpXFqRxnc-F9SwqT3hNKN_wsszU-h4qrxbyT2bzdCbHDy68ObiQmQQ_U6-mGOXZ1y__z158P2Rf3WEHUDYN0dtptkQ8BMs9qIOPMUD3d8oEy9n7f6YhZ-_LxfvsN7UU-SI</recordid><startdate>20230817</startdate><enddate>20230817</enddate><creator>Shinohara, Satoshi</creator><creator>Kasai, Mayuko</creator><creator>Yasuda, Genki</creator><creator>Sunami, Rei</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-1097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-1141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230817</creationdate><title>Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa</title><author>Shinohara, Satoshi ; Kasai, Mayuko ; Yasuda, Genki ; Sunami, Rei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-b0d5b24005510419b3d46302a15737177722329c7b16e0807e5af93069dd199a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Canals (anatomy)</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Cesarean section</topic><topic>Conjugates</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Endometriosis</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mann-Whitney U test</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Placenta</topic><topic>Placenta praevia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Uterus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shinohara, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Mayuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuda, Genki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sunami, Rei</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shinohara, Satoshi</au><au>Kasai, Mayuko</au><au>Yasuda, Genki</au><au>Sunami, Rei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-08-17</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0290244</spage><epage>e0290244</epage><pages>e0290244-e0290244</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</notes><abstract>Pouch of Douglas obliteration, which prevents exteriorization of the uterus, increases surgical morbidity in patients with placenta previa. We aimed to identify magnetic resonance imaging features that can predict pouch of Douglas obliteration preoperatively. We retrospectively assessed 39 women with posterior placenta previa who underwent magnetic resonance imaging for the preoperative assessment of placenta accreta spectrum. We defined the angle formed by the anatomical conjugate line (based on pelvimetry) and the cervical canal as the cervical inclination angle, which was measured on sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, we analyzed the correlation between the cervical inclination angle and pouch of Douglas obliteration. The median maternal age was 34 years (range, 22-44 years) and 26 (66.7%) women delivered at term. The median cervical inclination angle was 98° (range, 71-128). Pouch of Douglas obliteration was confirmed in six patients (15.4%). The cut-off value of the cervical inclination angle for the prediction of pouch of Douglas obliteration was 102° with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 78.8%, positive predictive value of 36.4%, and negative predictive value of 92.9% (area under the curve, 0.83). Measuring the cervical inclination angle may help in ruling out an obliteration of the pouch of Douglas. It may also be useful in the operative management of women with posterior placenta previa. However, caution should be exercised when generalizing the results of this study because of the small sample size, which makes the results prone to bias.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0290244</doi><tpages>e0290244</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-1097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-1141</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-08, Vol.18 (8), p.e0290244-e0290244
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2852599679
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Biology and Life Sciences
Canals (anatomy)
Cervix
Cesarean section
Conjugates
Diagnosis
Endometriosis
Gestational age
Glucose
Government agencies
Health aspects
Hospitals
Inclination angle
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mann-Whitney U test
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Medicine, Experimental
Morbidity
Patients
Placenta
Placenta praevia
Pregnancy
Pregnancy complications
Pregnant women
Research and Analysis Methods
Risk factors
Ultrasonic imaging
Uterus
title Utility of the angle between the cervical canal and the anatomical conjugate line for predicting pouch of Douglas obliteration in patients with posterior placenta previa
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T04%3A45%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utility%20of%20the%20angle%20between%20the%20cervical%20canal%20and%20the%20anatomical%20conjugate%20line%20for%20predicting%20pouch%20of%20Douglas%20obliteration%20in%20patients%20with%20posterior%20placenta%20previa&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Shinohara,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2023-08-17&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0290244&rft.epage=e0290244&rft.pages=e0290244-e0290244&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0290244&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA761278744%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-b0d5b24005510419b3d46302a15737177722329c7b16e0807e5af93069dd199a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2852599679&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A761278744&rfr_iscdi=true