Loading…

Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens

Invasive plants have the potential to interfere with native species' reproductive success through a number of mechanisms, including heterospecific pollination and hybridization. This study investigated reproductive interactions between a native North American woody vine (American bittersweet, C...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248635-e0248635
Main Authors: Zaya, David N, Leicht-Young, Stacey A, Pavlovic, Noel B, Ashley, Mary V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3
container_end_page e0248635
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0248635
container_title PloS one
container_volume 16
creator Zaya, David N
Leicht-Young, Stacey A
Pavlovic, Noel B
Ashley, Mary V
description Invasive plants have the potential to interfere with native species' reproductive success through a number of mechanisms, including heterospecific pollination and hybridization. This study investigated reproductive interactions between a native North American woody vine (American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens) and an introduced congener (oriental bittersweet, C. orbiculatus). The decline of C. scandens in the eastern portion of its range is coincident with the introduction and spread of C. orbiculatus, and the two species are known to hybridize. The relationship between proximity and floral production of conspecific and heterospecific males on fertilization and hybridization rates was measured at a field site in northwestern Indiana, USA where both species occur and reproduce. We found that the invasive vine had an extreme advantage in both male and female floral production, producing nearly 200 times more flowers per staminate plant and 65 times more flowers per pistillate plant than the native. Using nuclear microsatellite DNA markers we found that hybridization rates were asymmetric; 39% of the C. scandens seeds tested were hybrids, compared to only 1.6% of C. orbiculatus seeds. The asymmetric hybridization rates were likely not solely due to greater abundance of C. orbiculatus pollen because experimental hand crosses revealed that C. scandens had a higher rate (41%) of heterospecific fertilization than C. orbiculatus (2.4%). We previously reported that few hybrids were observed in the wild, and hybrids had greatly reduced fecundity. Thus, in our system, the threat posed by heterospecific pollen is not replacement by hybrids or introgression, but rather asymmetric reproductive interference. Reproductive interference extended to distances as great as 100 meters, thus, efforts to conserve the native species must reduce its exposure to C. orbiculatus over a relatively large spatial scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0248635
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2504306606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A656020306</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_13cd1467bf624af1a824dc26784b7f6e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A656020306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3LX6D0QHBFGwNZNkkpkboRR1CwsLft2GTOakTZkm3SRT3X9vup1dOrIXkouEnOe8JzkfWfayQLOC8OLjxvXeym62cxZmCNOKkfJRdl7UBE8ZRuTxyfksexbCBqGSVIw9zc4I4WXJKnye7S4ggndhB8poo_Kd6zpjZTTO5s1NLm1u7F4Gs4dcObsCCz6Paw8ygg3pBPkBTtb5FrxRiW9MTIrhN0D8kC-gkyH6PuQh2drk8zx7omUX4MWwT7KfXz7_WFxML6--Lhfzy6liNY5TTjXmCmletoQ3DWqqooJG0pJgqrQEUnNStQxXuK1BF1LTlmtKUVu3FaNck0n2-qi761wQQ7KCwCWiBDGGWCKWR6J1ciN23mylvxFOGnF74fxKSB-N6kAURLUFZbzRDFOZwlWYtgozXtGGawZJ69MQrW-20Cqw0ctuJDq2WLMWK7cXvK54wesk8G4Q8O66hxDF1gQFXSctuP74bs7ZoYST7M0_6MO_G6iVTB8wVrsUVx1ExZyVDKWuuKVmD1BptbA1qeCgTbofObwfOSQmwp-4kn0IYvn92_-zV7_G7NsTdg2yi-vguv7QiGEM0iOoUtcGD_o-yQUSh8G4y4Y4DIYYBiO5vTot0L3T3SSQv2MBCgo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2504306606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zaya, David N ; Leicht-Young, Stacey A ; Pavlovic, Noel B ; Ashley, Mary V</creator><contributor>Hipólito, Juliana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zaya, David N ; Leicht-Young, Stacey A ; Pavlovic, Noel B ; Ashley, Mary V ; Hipólito, Juliana</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive plants have the potential to interfere with native species' reproductive success through a number of mechanisms, including heterospecific pollination and hybridization. This study investigated reproductive interactions between a native North American woody vine (American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens) and an introduced congener (oriental bittersweet, C. orbiculatus). The decline of C. scandens in the eastern portion of its range is coincident with the introduction and spread of C. orbiculatus, and the two species are known to hybridize. The relationship between proximity and floral production of conspecific and heterospecific males on fertilization and hybridization rates was measured at a field site in northwestern Indiana, USA where both species occur and reproduce. We found that the invasive vine had an extreme advantage in both male and female floral production, producing nearly 200 times more flowers per staminate plant and 65 times more flowers per pistillate plant than the native. Using nuclear microsatellite DNA markers we found that hybridization rates were asymmetric; 39% of the C. scandens seeds tested were hybrids, compared to only 1.6% of C. orbiculatus seeds. The asymmetric hybridization rates were likely not solely due to greater abundance of C. orbiculatus pollen because experimental hand crosses revealed that C. scandens had a higher rate (41%) of heterospecific fertilization than C. orbiculatus (2.4%). We previously reported that few hybrids were observed in the wild, and hybrids had greatly reduced fecundity. Thus, in our system, the threat posed by heterospecific pollen is not replacement by hybrids or introgression, but rather asymmetric reproductive interference. Reproductive interference extended to distances as great as 100 meters, thus, efforts to conserve the native species must reduce its exposure to C. orbiculatus over a relatively large spatial scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248635</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33755682</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Asymmetry ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Breeding success ; Celastrus orbiculatus ; Celastrus scandens ; Congeners ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Ecology and Environmental Sciences ; Environmental aspects ; Fecundity ; Fertilization ; Flowers ; Hybridization ; Hybrids ; Indigenous species ; Interference ; Invasive plants ; Measuring instruments ; National parks ; Plant introduction ; Plant reproduction ; Pollen ; Pollination ; Reproduction ; Seeds</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248635-e0248635</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7393-3889 ; 0000-0002-2335-2274</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2504306606/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2504306606?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,25783,27957,27958,37047,37048,44625,53827,53829,75483</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33755682$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hipólito, Juliana</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zaya, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leicht-Young, Stacey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, Noel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, Mary V</creatorcontrib><title>Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Invasive plants have the potential to interfere with native species' reproductive success through a number of mechanisms, including heterospecific pollination and hybridization. This study investigated reproductive interactions between a native North American woody vine (American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens) and an introduced congener (oriental bittersweet, C. orbiculatus). The decline of C. scandens in the eastern portion of its range is coincident with the introduction and spread of C. orbiculatus, and the two species are known to hybridize. The relationship between proximity and floral production of conspecific and heterospecific males on fertilization and hybridization rates was measured at a field site in northwestern Indiana, USA where both species occur and reproduce. We found that the invasive vine had an extreme advantage in both male and female floral production, producing nearly 200 times more flowers per staminate plant and 65 times more flowers per pistillate plant than the native. Using nuclear microsatellite DNA markers we found that hybridization rates were asymmetric; 39% of the C. scandens seeds tested were hybrids, compared to only 1.6% of C. orbiculatus seeds. The asymmetric hybridization rates were likely not solely due to greater abundance of C. orbiculatus pollen because experimental hand crosses revealed that C. scandens had a higher rate (41%) of heterospecific fertilization than C. orbiculatus (2.4%). We previously reported that few hybrids were observed in the wild, and hybrids had greatly reduced fecundity. Thus, in our system, the threat posed by heterospecific pollen is not replacement by hybrids or introgression, but rather asymmetric reproductive interference. Reproductive interference extended to distances as great as 100 meters, thus, efforts to conserve the native species must reduce its exposure to C. orbiculatus over a relatively large spatial scale.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Celastrus orbiculatus</subject><subject>Celastrus scandens</subject><subject>Congeners</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Flowers</subject><subject>Hybridization</subject><subject>Hybrids</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Interference</subject><subject>Invasive plants</subject><subject>Measuring instruments</subject><subject>National parks</subject><subject>Plant introduction</subject><subject>Plant reproduction</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollination</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk12LEzEUhgdR3LX6D0QHBFGwNZNkkpkboRR1CwsLft2GTOakTZkm3SRT3X9vup1dOrIXkouEnOe8JzkfWfayQLOC8OLjxvXeym62cxZmCNOKkfJRdl7UBE8ZRuTxyfksexbCBqGSVIw9zc4I4WXJKnye7S4ggndhB8poo_Kd6zpjZTTO5s1NLm1u7F4Gs4dcObsCCz6Paw8ygg3pBPkBTtb5FrxRiW9MTIrhN0D8kC-gkyH6PuQh2drk8zx7omUX4MWwT7KfXz7_WFxML6--Lhfzy6liNY5TTjXmCmletoQ3DWqqooJG0pJgqrQEUnNStQxXuK1BF1LTlmtKUVu3FaNck0n2-qi761wQQ7KCwCWiBDGGWCKWR6J1ciN23mylvxFOGnF74fxKSB-N6kAURLUFZbzRDFOZwlWYtgozXtGGawZJ69MQrW-20Cqw0ctuJDq2WLMWK7cXvK54wesk8G4Q8O66hxDF1gQFXSctuP74bs7ZoYST7M0_6MO_G6iVTB8wVrsUVx1ExZyVDKWuuKVmD1BptbA1qeCgTbofObwfOSQmwp-4kn0IYvn92_-zV7_G7NsTdg2yi-vguv7QiGEM0iOoUtcGD_o-yQUSh8G4y4Y4DIYYBiO5vTot0L3T3SSQv2MBCgo</recordid><startdate>20210323</startdate><enddate>20210323</enddate><creator>Zaya, David N</creator><creator>Leicht-Young, Stacey A</creator><creator>Pavlovic, Noel B</creator><creator>Ashley, Mary V</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7393-3889</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-2274</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210323</creationdate><title>Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens</title><author>Zaya, David N ; Leicht-Young, Stacey A ; Pavlovic, Noel B ; Ashley, Mary V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Celastrus orbiculatus</topic><topic>Celastrus scandens</topic><topic>Congeners</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Ecology and Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Flowers</topic><topic>Hybridization</topic><topic>Hybrids</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Interference</topic><topic>Invasive plants</topic><topic>Measuring instruments</topic><topic>National parks</topic><topic>Plant introduction</topic><topic>Plant reproduction</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollination</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zaya, David N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leicht-Young, Stacey A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlovic, Noel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashley, Mary V</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zaya, David N</au><au>Leicht-Young, Stacey A</au><au>Pavlovic, Noel B</au><au>Ashley, Mary V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2021-03-23</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0248635</spage><epage>e0248635</epage><pages>e0248635-e0248635</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Current address: RK&amp;K, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America</notes><notes>Competing Interests: One author (SLY) is currently affiliated with a commercial entity, though she was not at the time that the study was conceived and executed. This affiliation does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</notes><notes>Current address: Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, United States of America</notes><abstract>Invasive plants have the potential to interfere with native species' reproductive success through a number of mechanisms, including heterospecific pollination and hybridization. This study investigated reproductive interactions between a native North American woody vine (American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens) and an introduced congener (oriental bittersweet, C. orbiculatus). The decline of C. scandens in the eastern portion of its range is coincident with the introduction and spread of C. orbiculatus, and the two species are known to hybridize. The relationship between proximity and floral production of conspecific and heterospecific males on fertilization and hybridization rates was measured at a field site in northwestern Indiana, USA where both species occur and reproduce. We found that the invasive vine had an extreme advantage in both male and female floral production, producing nearly 200 times more flowers per staminate plant and 65 times more flowers per pistillate plant than the native. Using nuclear microsatellite DNA markers we found that hybridization rates were asymmetric; 39% of the C. scandens seeds tested were hybrids, compared to only 1.6% of C. orbiculatus seeds. The asymmetric hybridization rates were likely not solely due to greater abundance of C. orbiculatus pollen because experimental hand crosses revealed that C. scandens had a higher rate (41%) of heterospecific fertilization than C. orbiculatus (2.4%). We previously reported that few hybrids were observed in the wild, and hybrids had greatly reduced fecundity. Thus, in our system, the threat posed by heterospecific pollen is not replacement by hybrids or introgression, but rather asymmetric reproductive interference. Reproductive interference extended to distances as great as 100 meters, thus, efforts to conserve the native species must reduce its exposure to C. orbiculatus over a relatively large spatial scale.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>33755682</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0248635</doi><tpages>e0248635</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7393-3889</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2335-2274</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2021-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e0248635-e0248635
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2504306606
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Animal behavior
Asymmetry
Biology and Life Sciences
Breeding success
Celastrus orbiculatus
Celastrus scandens
Congeners
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Environmental aspects
Fecundity
Fertilization
Flowers
Hybridization
Hybrids
Indigenous species
Interference
Invasive plants
Measuring instruments
National parks
Plant introduction
Plant reproduction
Pollen
Pollination
Reproduction
Seeds
title Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-21T19%3A56%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Heterospecific%20pollination%20by%20an%20invasive%20congener%20threatens%20the%20native%20American%20bittersweet,%20Celastrus%20scandens&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Zaya,%20David%20N&rft.date=2021-03-23&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0248635&rft.epage=e0248635&rft.pages=e0248635-e0248635&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0248635&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA656020306%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-74f27c0f75d37bb0b818eba45324cfae39738d6282d9ef1af4d7f440d9d8647f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2504306606&rft_id=info:pmid/33755682&rft_galeid=A656020306&rfr_iscdi=true