Loading…

Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs

Massive declines in insect biodiversity and biomass are reported from many regions and habitats. In urban areas, creation of native wildflower meadows is one option to support insects and reduce maintenance costs of urban green spaces. However, benefits for insect conservation may depend on previous...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0234327-e0234327
Main Authors: Mody, Karsten, Lerch, Doris, Muller, Ann-Kathrin, Simons, Nadja K, Blüthgen, Nico, Harnisch, Matthias
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613
container_end_page e0234327
container_issue 6
container_start_page e0234327
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Mody, Karsten
Lerch, Doris
Muller, Ann-Kathrin
Simons, Nadja K
Blüthgen, Nico
Harnisch, Matthias
description Massive declines in insect biodiversity and biomass are reported from many regions and habitats. In urban areas, creation of native wildflower meadows is one option to support insects and reduce maintenance costs of urban green spaces. However, benefits for insect conservation may depend on previous land use, and the size and location of new wildflower meadows. We show effects of conversion of roadside plantings-from exotic shrubs into wildflower meadows-on (1) the abundance of 13 arthropod taxa-Opiliones, Araneae, Isopoda, Collembola, Orthoptera, Aphidoidea, Auchenorrhyncha, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Nematocera, Brachycera, Apocrita, Formicidae-and (2) changes in maintenance costs. We assessed the influence of vegetation type (meadow vs. woody), meadow age, size, location (distance to city boundary), and mowing regime. We found many, but not all, arthropod taxa profiting from meadows in terms of arthropod activity abundance in pitfall traps and arthropod density in standardized suction samples. Arthropod number in meadows was 212% higher in pitfall traps and 260% higher in suction samples compared to woody vegetation. The increased arthropod number in meadows was independent of the size and isolation of green spaces for most taxa. However, mowing regime strongly affected several arthropod taxa, with an increase of 63% of total arthropod density in unmown compared to mown meadow spots. Costs of green space maintenance were fivefold lower for meadows than for woody vegetation. Our study shows that (1) many different arthropod taxa occur in roadside vegetation in urban areas, (2) replacement of exotic woody vegetation by native wildflower meadows can significantly increase arthropod abundance, especially if meadow management permits temporarily unmown areas, and (3) maintenance costs can be considerably reduced by converting woody plantings into wildflower meadows. Considering many groups of arthropods, our study provides new insights into possible measures to support arthropods in urban environments.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0234327
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_plos_journals_2411076509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A626170944</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_37423c46ad404b0690c4ebe6b9b498a5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A626170944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A8EBQfRi13xNZsYLoRSrC4VC_bgNmeTMbpZMsiYZ173zp5vtrtKRXkggOSTPed_kkFMUzzGaY1rjt2s_BiftfOMdzBGhjJL6QXGKW0pmnCD68E58UjyJcY1QRRvOHxcnlFSY04qdFr8urd9CKDe3s3FlWkGpTNq9K29gY6UyblkGL3U0Gsq4CmMXy25Xbo3V_SF1AKn9NuZkFUBG2EcRVCrdOHQQYimdLgPoUeWjQRqXwEmnso2PKT4tHvXSRnh2XM-Kr5cfvlx8ml1df1xcnF_NFOdtmnUAQHgjKfSg6hbXFFFJeS97jRugGnGqSFth3SjGad31inUEV6ijLdKEY3pWvDjobqyP4li8KAjDGNW8Qm0mFgdCe7kWm2AGGXbCSyNuN3xYChmSURYErRmh2UhqhliHeIsUgw5413asbWSVtd4f3cZuAK3ApSDtRHR64sxKLP0PUZOG8IplgddHgeC_jxCTGExUYK104MfDvasGM9Rk9OU_6P2vO1JLmR9gXO-zr9qLinOeC1Sjlu1t5_dQeWgYjMo_rTd5f5LwZpKQmQQ_01KOMYrF55v_Z6-_TdlXd9gVSJtW0dsxGe_iFGQHUAUfY4D-b5ExEvtG-VMNsW8UcWwU-ht5nAWG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2411076509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Mody, Karsten ; Lerch, Doris ; Muller, Ann-Kathrin ; Simons, Nadja K ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Harnisch, Matthias</creator><contributor>Del-Claro, Kleber</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mody, Karsten ; Lerch, Doris ; Muller, Ann-Kathrin ; Simons, Nadja K ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Harnisch, Matthias ; Del-Claro, Kleber</creatorcontrib><description>Massive declines in insect biodiversity and biomass are reported from many regions and habitats. In urban areas, creation of native wildflower meadows is one option to support insects and reduce maintenance costs of urban green spaces. However, benefits for insect conservation may depend on previous land use, and the size and location of new wildflower meadows. We show effects of conversion of roadside plantings-from exotic shrubs into wildflower meadows-on (1) the abundance of 13 arthropod taxa-Opiliones, Araneae, Isopoda, Collembola, Orthoptera, Aphidoidea, Auchenorrhyncha, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Nematocera, Brachycera, Apocrita, Formicidae-and (2) changes in maintenance costs. We assessed the influence of vegetation type (meadow vs. woody), meadow age, size, location (distance to city boundary), and mowing regime. We found many, but not all, arthropod taxa profiting from meadows in terms of arthropod activity abundance in pitfall traps and arthropod density in standardized suction samples. Arthropod number in meadows was 212% higher in pitfall traps and 260% higher in suction samples compared to woody vegetation. The increased arthropod number in meadows was independent of the size and isolation of green spaces for most taxa. However, mowing regime strongly affected several arthropod taxa, with an increase of 63% of total arthropod density in unmown compared to mown meadow spots. Costs of green space maintenance were fivefold lower for meadows than for woody vegetation. Our study shows that (1) many different arthropod taxa occur in roadside vegetation in urban areas, (2) replacement of exotic woody vegetation by native wildflower meadows can significantly increase arthropod abundance, especially if meadow management permits temporarily unmown areas, and (3) maintenance costs can be considerably reduced by converting woody plantings into wildflower meadows. Considering many groups of arthropods, our study provides new insights into possible measures to support arthropods in urban environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32516354</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animals ; Arthropoda ; Arthropods ; Biodiversity ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; Cost assessments ; Costs ; Density ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Environmental aspects ; Flowers &amp; plants ; Habitats ; Insects ; Introduced plants ; Land use ; Landscape ecology ; Maintenance costs ; Management ; Meadows ; Metropolitan areas ; Mowing ; Native species ; Open spaces ; Pitfall traps ; Roadside plants ; Roadsides ; Shrubs ; Suction ; Urban areas ; Urban environments ; Urban planning ; Vegetation ; Vegetation type ; Wild flowers ; Woody plants</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0234327-e0234327</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Mody et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Mody et al 2020 Mody et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2718-7050 ; 0000-0002-9251-0803</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2411076509/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2411076509?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,733,786,790,891,25783,27899,27957,27958,37047,37048,44625,53827,53829,75483</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Del-Claro, Kleber</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mody, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerch, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Ann-Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Nadja K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blüthgen, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnisch, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs</title><title>PloS one</title><description>Massive declines in insect biodiversity and biomass are reported from many regions and habitats. In urban areas, creation of native wildflower meadows is one option to support insects and reduce maintenance costs of urban green spaces. However, benefits for insect conservation may depend on previous land use, and the size and location of new wildflower meadows. We show effects of conversion of roadside plantings-from exotic shrubs into wildflower meadows-on (1) the abundance of 13 arthropod taxa-Opiliones, Araneae, Isopoda, Collembola, Orthoptera, Aphidoidea, Auchenorrhyncha, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Nematocera, Brachycera, Apocrita, Formicidae-and (2) changes in maintenance costs. We assessed the influence of vegetation type (meadow vs. woody), meadow age, size, location (distance to city boundary), and mowing regime. We found many, but not all, arthropod taxa profiting from meadows in terms of arthropod activity abundance in pitfall traps and arthropod density in standardized suction samples. Arthropod number in meadows was 212% higher in pitfall traps and 260% higher in suction samples compared to woody vegetation. The increased arthropod number in meadows was independent of the size and isolation of green spaces for most taxa. However, mowing regime strongly affected several arthropod taxa, with an increase of 63% of total arthropod density in unmown compared to mown meadow spots. Costs of green space maintenance were fivefold lower for meadows than for woody vegetation. Our study shows that (1) many different arthropod taxa occur in roadside vegetation in urban areas, (2) replacement of exotic woody vegetation by native wildflower meadows can significantly increase arthropod abundance, especially if meadow management permits temporarily unmown areas, and (3) maintenance costs can be considerably reduced by converting woody plantings into wildflower meadows. Considering many groups of arthropods, our study provides new insights into possible measures to support arthropods in urban environments.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Arthropoda</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Cost assessments</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Flowers &amp; plants</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Introduced plants</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Landscape ecology</subject><subject>Maintenance costs</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Meadows</subject><subject>Metropolitan areas</subject><subject>Mowing</subject><subject>Native species</subject><subject>Open spaces</subject><subject>Pitfall traps</subject><subject>Roadside plants</subject><subject>Roadsides</subject><subject>Shrubs</subject><subject>Suction</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban environments</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation type</subject><subject>Wild flowers</subject><subject>Woody plants</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk11rFDEUhgdRbK3-A8EBQfRi13xNZsYLoRSrC4VC_bgNmeTMbpZMsiYZ173zp5vtrtKRXkggOSTPed_kkFMUzzGaY1rjt2s_BiftfOMdzBGhjJL6QXGKW0pmnCD68E58UjyJcY1QRRvOHxcnlFSY04qdFr8urd9CKDe3s3FlWkGpTNq9K29gY6UyblkGL3U0Gsq4CmMXy25Xbo3V_SF1AKn9NuZkFUBG2EcRVCrdOHQQYimdLgPoUeWjQRqXwEmnso2PKT4tHvXSRnh2XM-Kr5cfvlx8ml1df1xcnF_NFOdtmnUAQHgjKfSg6hbXFFFJeS97jRugGnGqSFth3SjGad31inUEV6ijLdKEY3pWvDjobqyP4li8KAjDGNW8Qm0mFgdCe7kWm2AGGXbCSyNuN3xYChmSURYErRmh2UhqhliHeIsUgw5413asbWSVtd4f3cZuAK3ApSDtRHR64sxKLP0PUZOG8IplgddHgeC_jxCTGExUYK104MfDvasGM9Rk9OU_6P2vO1JLmR9gXO-zr9qLinOeC1Sjlu1t5_dQeWgYjMo_rTd5f5LwZpKQmQQ_01KOMYrF55v_Z6-_TdlXd9gVSJtW0dsxGe_iFGQHUAUfY4D-b5ExEvtG-VMNsW8UcWwU-ht5nAWG</recordid><startdate>20200609</startdate><enddate>20200609</enddate><creator>Mody, Karsten</creator><creator>Lerch, Doris</creator><creator>Muller, Ann-Kathrin</creator><creator>Simons, Nadja K</creator><creator>Blüthgen, Nico</creator><creator>Harnisch, Matthias</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-7050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-0803</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200609</creationdate><title>Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs</title><author>Mody, Karsten ; Lerch, Doris ; Muller, Ann-Kathrin ; Simons, Nadja K ; Blüthgen, Nico ; Harnisch, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Arthropoda</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Cost assessments</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Flowers &amp; plants</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Introduced plants</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Landscape ecology</topic><topic>Maintenance costs</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Meadows</topic><topic>Metropolitan areas</topic><topic>Mowing</topic><topic>Native species</topic><topic>Open spaces</topic><topic>Pitfall traps</topic><topic>Roadside plants</topic><topic>Roadsides</topic><topic>Shrubs</topic><topic>Suction</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban environments</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation type</topic><topic>Wild flowers</topic><topic>Woody plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mody, Karsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerch, Doris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, Ann-Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simons, Nadja K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blüthgen, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnisch, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>PHMC-Proquest健康医学期刊库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ : Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mody, Karsten</au><au>Lerch, Doris</au><au>Muller, Ann-Kathrin</au><au>Simons, Nadja K</au><au>Blüthgen, Nico</au><au>Harnisch, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2020-06-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e0234327</spage><epage>e0234327</epage><pages>e0234327-e0234327</pages><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><notes>ObjectType-Article-1</notes><notes>SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1</notes><notes>ObjectType-Feature-2</notes><notes>content type line 23</notes><notes>Current address: Department of Applied Ecology, Hochschule Geisenheim University, Geisenheim, Germany</notes><notes>Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</notes><abstract>Massive declines in insect biodiversity and biomass are reported from many regions and habitats. In urban areas, creation of native wildflower meadows is one option to support insects and reduce maintenance costs of urban green spaces. However, benefits for insect conservation may depend on previous land use, and the size and location of new wildflower meadows. We show effects of conversion of roadside plantings-from exotic shrubs into wildflower meadows-on (1) the abundance of 13 arthropod taxa-Opiliones, Araneae, Isopoda, Collembola, Orthoptera, Aphidoidea, Auchenorrhyncha, Heteroptera, Coleoptera, Nematocera, Brachycera, Apocrita, Formicidae-and (2) changes in maintenance costs. We assessed the influence of vegetation type (meadow vs. woody), meadow age, size, location (distance to city boundary), and mowing regime. We found many, but not all, arthropod taxa profiting from meadows in terms of arthropod activity abundance in pitfall traps and arthropod density in standardized suction samples. Arthropod number in meadows was 212% higher in pitfall traps and 260% higher in suction samples compared to woody vegetation. The increased arthropod number in meadows was independent of the size and isolation of green spaces for most taxa. However, mowing regime strongly affected several arthropod taxa, with an increase of 63% of total arthropod density in unmown compared to mown meadow spots. Costs of green space maintenance were fivefold lower for meadows than for woody vegetation. Our study shows that (1) many different arthropod taxa occur in roadside vegetation in urban areas, (2) replacement of exotic woody vegetation by native wildflower meadows can significantly increase arthropod abundance, especially if meadow management permits temporarily unmown areas, and (3) maintenance costs can be considerably reduced by converting woody plantings into wildflower meadows. Considering many groups of arthropods, our study provides new insights into possible measures to support arthropods in urban environments.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>32516354</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0234327</doi><tpages>e0234327</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-7050</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9251-0803</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-06, Vol.15 (6), p.e0234327-e0234327
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_plos_journals_2411076509
source Open Access: PubMed Central; PAIS Index; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Abundance
Animals
Arthropoda
Arthropods
Biodiversity
Biology and Life Sciences
Conservation
Cost assessments
Costs
Density
Earth Sciences
Ecosystems
Environmental aspects
Flowers & plants
Habitats
Insects
Introduced plants
Land use
Landscape ecology
Maintenance costs
Management
Meadows
Metropolitan areas
Mowing
Native species
Open spaces
Pitfall traps
Roadside plants
Roadsides
Shrubs
Suction
Urban areas
Urban environments
Urban planning
Vegetation
Vegetation type
Wild flowers
Woody plants
title Flower power in the city: Replacing roadside shrubs by wildflower meadows increases insect numbers and reduces maintenance costs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T09%3A21%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flower%20power%20in%20the%20city:%20Replacing%20roadside%20shrubs%20by%20wildflower%20meadows%20increases%20insect%20numbers%20and%20reduces%20maintenance%20costs&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Mody,%20Karsten&rft.date=2020-06-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e0234327&rft.epage=e0234327&rft.pages=e0234327-e0234327&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0234327&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA626170944%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669t-beee268a3efec7917303a36fafd18e3d063c2951d8c4637bfc4b2150b390d2613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2411076509&rft_id=info:pmid/32516354&rft_galeid=A626170944&rfr_iscdi=true