Probability matching as a computational strategy used in perception

The question of which strategy is employed in human decision making has been studied extensively in the context of cognitive tasks; however, this question has not been investigated systematically in the context of perceptual tasks. The goal of this study was to gain insight into the decision-making...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS computational biology 2010-08, Vol.6 (8), p.e1000871-864
Main Authors: Wozny, David R, Beierholm, Ulrik R, Shams, Ladan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Charitable foundations
Computational Biology/Computational Neuroscience
Decision Making
Economic models
Female
Human information processing
Human performance
Humans
Male
Neuroscience/Cognitive Neuroscience
Neuroscience/Experimental Psychology
Neuroscience/Sensory Systems
Neuroscience/Theoretical Neuroscience
Perception
Probability
Probability Learning
Sound Localization - physiology
Studies
Visual Perception - physiology
Young Adult
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The question of which strategy is employed in human decision making has been studied extensively in the context of cognitive tasks; however, this question has not been investigated systematically in the context of perceptual tasks. The goal of this study was to gain insight into the decision-making strategy used by human observers in a low-level perceptual task. Data from more than 100 individuals who participated in an auditory-visual spatial localization task was evaluated to examine which of three plausible strategies could account for each observer's behavior the best. This task is very suitable for exploring this question because it involves an implicit inference about whether the auditory and visual stimuli were caused by the same object or independent objects, and provides different strategies of how using the inference about causes can lead to distinctly different spatial estimates and response patterns. For example, employing the commonly used cost function of minimizing the mean squared error of spatial estimates would result in a weighted averaging of estimates corresponding to different causal structures. A strategy that would minimize the error in the inferred causal structure would result in the selection of the most likely causal structure and sticking with it in the subsequent inference of location-"model selection." A third strategy is one that selects a causal structure in proportion to its probability, thus attempting to match the probability of the inferred causal structure. This type of probability matching strategy has been reported to be used by participants predominantly in cognitive tasks. Comparing these three strategies, the behavior of the vast majority of observers in this perceptual task was most consistent with probability matching. While this appears to be a suboptimal strategy and hence a surprising choice for the perceptual system to adopt, we discuss potential advantages of such a strategy for perception.
ISSN:1553-7358
1553-734X
1553-7358
DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000871