Loading…

Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types

Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) liquifies wet feedstocks to produce a biocrude under moderate temperatures (300–450 °C) and high pressures (>2500 psi). The biocrude can be upgraded to transportation fuels (predominantly diesel) using typical refinery unit operations (e.g., hydrotreater and distil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering 2022-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1256-1266
Main Authors: Cronin, Dylan, Schmidt, Andrew J, Billing, Justin, Hart, Todd R, Fox, Samuel P, Fonoll, Xavier, Norton, John, Thorson, Michael R
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3
container_end_page 1266
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1256
container_title ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering
container_volume 10
creator Cronin, Dylan
Schmidt, Andrew J
Billing, Justin
Hart, Todd R
Fox, Samuel P
Fonoll, Xavier
Norton, John
Thorson, Michael R
description Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) liquifies wet feedstocks to produce a biocrude under moderate temperatures (300–450 °C) and high pressures (>2500 psi). The biocrude can be upgraded to transportation fuels (predominantly diesel) using typical refinery unit operations (e.g., hydrotreater and distillation). HTL of wet-wastes is a promising route to produce environmentally friendly and cost-competitive fuels; however, the feedstock significantly impacts the product quality and the process yield. Consequently, it is important to rigorously compare different feedstocks to determine the critical material attributes, which impact the biocrude yield and quality. A few published comprehensive studies evaluate the performance of numerous different wet-waste HTL feed types, processed using the same reactor configuration and analytical approach. This is particularly true for continuous flow HTL. HTL studies generally investigate one or a few surrogate feedstocks or model compound materials or attempt comparative reviews by collecting the results of numerous different research groups. Such an approach involves numerous assumptions that can significantly compromise the legitimacy of the data compared and the conclusions drawn. This work investigates HTL of 13 different real-world wet-waste feedstocks, belonging to multiple different classes of municipal wet-waste, including food waste, biosolids, sludge, fermentation residues, manure, and blends thereof. The biocrude carbon yields obtained throughout the study ranged from 39.7 to 74.3%. The biocrude yield varied through a range of different process changes, such as increasing reactor flow rate and feed solid loading, and addition of Fe-based additives. By analyzing a broad range of materials, and through the comprehensive characterization profiles prepared for both the feedstock and products, this study has produced a significant volume of data, which was then analyzed using robust statistical methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07214
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1859134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c563813578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoOOb-BCH43pmkTds8SnFOGPjgdI8hS65b59rMJFX635uxPeiTx8EdfL_v4D6EbimZUsLovdLe915voYVuM6WaFIxmF2jEaF4mJCv55a_9Gk2835FYQqSspCO0qWx7UE6F5gvwa-jNgG2HwxZwZbvQdL3tPZ7t7TeeD8bZKLhW7fGi-eyhVjo0kbY1fleuOZIrCMlK-QB4BmB8sPoDL4cD-Bt0Vau9h8l5jtHb7HFZzZPFy9Nz9bBIVMpYSLjIcs4KQgqIXRpmjKamFlypmhQCMrHO1zkjNVunNFdE8ZxTLXSZaiM0N-kY3Z3uWh8a6XUTQG-17TrQQdKSC5pmEeInSDvrvYNaHlzTKjdISuQxVfknVXlONfroyRdlubO96-Ir_3h-APONgWs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Cronin, Dylan ; Schmidt, Andrew J ; Billing, Justin ; Hart, Todd R ; Fox, Samuel P ; Fonoll, Xavier ; Norton, John ; Thorson, Michael R</creator><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Dylan ; Schmidt, Andrew J ; Billing, Justin ; Hart, Todd R ; Fox, Samuel P ; Fonoll, Xavier ; Norton, John ; Thorson, Michael R</creatorcontrib><description>Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) liquifies wet feedstocks to produce a biocrude under moderate temperatures (300–450 °C) and high pressures (&gt;2500 psi). The biocrude can be upgraded to transportation fuels (predominantly diesel) using typical refinery unit operations (e.g., hydrotreater and distillation). HTL of wet-wastes is a promising route to produce environmentally friendly and cost-competitive fuels; however, the feedstock significantly impacts the product quality and the process yield. Consequently, it is important to rigorously compare different feedstocks to determine the critical material attributes, which impact the biocrude yield and quality. A few published comprehensive studies evaluate the performance of numerous different wet-waste HTL feed types, processed using the same reactor configuration and analytical approach. This is particularly true for continuous flow HTL. HTL studies generally investigate one or a few surrogate feedstocks or model compound materials or attempt comparative reviews by collecting the results of numerous different research groups. Such an approach involves numerous assumptions that can significantly compromise the legitimacy of the data compared and the conclusions drawn. This work investigates HTL of 13 different real-world wet-waste feedstocks, belonging to multiple different classes of municipal wet-waste, including food waste, biosolids, sludge, fermentation residues, manure, and blends thereof. The biocrude carbon yields obtained throughout the study ranged from 39.7 to 74.3%. The biocrude yield varied through a range of different process changes, such as increasing reactor flow rate and feed solid loading, and addition of Fe-based additives. By analyzing a broad range of materials, and through the comprehensive characterization profiles prepared for both the feedstock and products, this study has produced a significant volume of data, which was then analyzed using robust statistical methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-0485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-0485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>ACS sustainable chemistry &amp; engineering, 2022-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1256-1266</ispartof><rights>2021 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3304-2437 ; 0000-0002-1962-154X ; 0000000333042437 ; 000000021962154X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/1859134$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billing, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Todd R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Samuel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonoll, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, Michael R</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types</title><title>ACS sustainable chemistry &amp; engineering</title><addtitle>ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng</addtitle><description>Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) liquifies wet feedstocks to produce a biocrude under moderate temperatures (300–450 °C) and high pressures (&gt;2500 psi). The biocrude can be upgraded to transportation fuels (predominantly diesel) using typical refinery unit operations (e.g., hydrotreater and distillation). HTL of wet-wastes is a promising route to produce environmentally friendly and cost-competitive fuels; however, the feedstock significantly impacts the product quality and the process yield. Consequently, it is important to rigorously compare different feedstocks to determine the critical material attributes, which impact the biocrude yield and quality. A few published comprehensive studies evaluate the performance of numerous different wet-waste HTL feed types, processed using the same reactor configuration and analytical approach. This is particularly true for continuous flow HTL. HTL studies generally investigate one or a few surrogate feedstocks or model compound materials or attempt comparative reviews by collecting the results of numerous different research groups. Such an approach involves numerous assumptions that can significantly compromise the legitimacy of the data compared and the conclusions drawn. This work investigates HTL of 13 different real-world wet-waste feedstocks, belonging to multiple different classes of municipal wet-waste, including food waste, biosolids, sludge, fermentation residues, manure, and blends thereof. The biocrude carbon yields obtained throughout the study ranged from 39.7 to 74.3%. The biocrude yield varied through a range of different process changes, such as increasing reactor flow rate and feed solid loading, and addition of Fe-based additives. By analyzing a broad range of materials, and through the comprehensive characterization profiles prepared for both the feedstock and products, this study has produced a significant volume of data, which was then analyzed using robust statistical methods.</description><issn>2168-0485</issn><issn>2168-0485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkNFLwzAQxoMoOOb-BCH43pmkTds8SnFOGPjgdI8hS65b59rMJFX635uxPeiTx8EdfL_v4D6EbimZUsLovdLe915voYVuM6WaFIxmF2jEaF4mJCv55a_9Gk2835FYQqSspCO0qWx7UE6F5gvwa-jNgG2HwxZwZbvQdL3tPZ7t7TeeD8bZKLhW7fGi-eyhVjo0kbY1fleuOZIrCMlK-QB4BmB8sPoDL4cD-Bt0Vau9h8l5jtHb7HFZzZPFy9Nz9bBIVMpYSLjIcs4KQgqIXRpmjKamFlypmhQCMrHO1zkjNVunNFdE8ZxTLXSZaiM0N-kY3Z3uWh8a6XUTQG-17TrQQdKSC5pmEeInSDvrvYNaHlzTKjdISuQxVfknVXlONfroyRdlubO96-Ir_3h-APONgWs</recordid><startdate>20220124</startdate><enddate>20220124</enddate><creator>Cronin, Dylan</creator><creator>Schmidt, Andrew J</creator><creator>Billing, Justin</creator><creator>Hart, Todd R</creator><creator>Fox, Samuel P</creator><creator>Fonoll, Xavier</creator><creator>Norton, John</creator><creator>Thorson, Michael R</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1962-154X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000333042437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000021962154X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220124</creationdate><title>Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types</title><author>Cronin, Dylan ; Schmidt, Andrew J ; Billing, Justin ; Hart, Todd R ; Fox, Samuel P ; Fonoll, Xavier ; Norton, John ; Thorson, Michael R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cronin, Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Andrew J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billing, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, Todd R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Samuel P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonoll, Xavier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norton, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorson, Michael R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>ACS sustainable chemistry &amp; engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cronin, Dylan</au><au>Schmidt, Andrew J</au><au>Billing, Justin</au><au>Hart, Todd R</au><au>Fox, Samuel P</au><au>Fonoll, Xavier</au><au>Norton, John</au><au>Thorson, Michael R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types</atitle><jtitle>ACS sustainable chemistry &amp; engineering</jtitle><addtitle>ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng</addtitle><date>2022-01-24</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1256</spage><epage>1266</epage><pages>1256-1266</pages><issn>2168-0485</issn><eissn>2168-0485</eissn><notes>AC05-76RL01830</notes><notes>USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)</notes><abstract>Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) liquifies wet feedstocks to produce a biocrude under moderate temperatures (300–450 °C) and high pressures (&gt;2500 psi). The biocrude can be upgraded to transportation fuels (predominantly diesel) using typical refinery unit operations (e.g., hydrotreater and distillation). HTL of wet-wastes is a promising route to produce environmentally friendly and cost-competitive fuels; however, the feedstock significantly impacts the product quality and the process yield. Consequently, it is important to rigorously compare different feedstocks to determine the critical material attributes, which impact the biocrude yield and quality. A few published comprehensive studies evaluate the performance of numerous different wet-waste HTL feed types, processed using the same reactor configuration and analytical approach. This is particularly true for continuous flow HTL. HTL studies generally investigate one or a few surrogate feedstocks or model compound materials or attempt comparative reviews by collecting the results of numerous different research groups. Such an approach involves numerous assumptions that can significantly compromise the legitimacy of the data compared and the conclusions drawn. This work investigates HTL of 13 different real-world wet-waste feedstocks, belonging to multiple different classes of municipal wet-waste, including food waste, biosolids, sludge, fermentation residues, manure, and blends thereof. The biocrude carbon yields obtained throughout the study ranged from 39.7 to 74.3%. The biocrude yield varied through a range of different process changes, such as increasing reactor flow rate and feed solid loading, and addition of Fe-based additives. By analyzing a broad range of materials, and through the comprehensive characterization profiles prepared for both the feedstock and products, this study has produced a significant volume of data, which was then analyzed using robust statistical methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07214</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3304-2437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1962-154X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000333042437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/000000021962154X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-0485
ispartof ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2022-01, Vol.10 (3), p.1256-1266
issn 2168-0485
2168-0485
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_1859134
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
title Comparative Study on the Continuous Flow Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Various Wet-Waste Feedstock Types
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-23T04%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20on%20the%20Continuous%20Flow%20Hydrothermal%20Liquefaction%20of%20Various%20Wet-Waste%20Feedstock%20Types&rft.jtitle=ACS%20sustainable%20chemistry%20&%20engineering&rft.au=Cronin,%20Dylan&rft.date=2022-01-24&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1256&rft.epage=1266&rft.pages=1256-1266&rft.issn=2168-0485&rft.eissn=2168-0485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07214&rft_dat=%3Cacs_osti_%3Ec563813578%3C/acs_osti_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a322t-5946527007e07e8d2ddc1df95aaf079e49b6b620f2b316a0a5651c9c83cd9c5d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true