Loading…

“Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration

Abstract This article explores “doubting with” in collaborative management research. Extending methodological reflections on collaboration between researchers and practitioners, this article, drawing on the foundations of the pragmatist inquiry, stresses the central role of doubt and the doubtful si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European management review 2023-09, Vol.21 (3), p.714-729
Main Authors: Arnoud, Justine, Peton, Hélène
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-891ced4b7f473e85ebd9a0ad93d21223d2e2054060c00163f93a667da6cf0b1d3
container_end_page 729
container_issue 3
container_start_page 714
container_title European management review
container_volume 21
creator Arnoud, Justine
Peton, Hélène
description Abstract This article explores “doubting with” in collaborative management research. Extending methodological reflections on collaboration between researchers and practitioners, this article, drawing on the foundations of the pragmatist inquiry, stresses the central role of doubt and the doubtful situation in overcoming difficulties that are encountered in problem‐oriented approaches. We propose guidelines for “doubting with” in collaborative research, highlighting how it transforms modes of researcher–practitioner collaboration and the opportunities it provides to restore possibilities of action with a broader social dimension. We emphasize how “doubting with” addresses the challenges of collaboration and the key implications for management research regarding the importance of keeping doubt alive in our inquiries and of doubting with practitioners.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/emre.12609
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04218980v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_04218980v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-891ced4b7f473e85ebd9a0ad93d21223d2e2054060c00163f93a667da6cf0b1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QTegpQydpwXu6oUilSJDawjx54QozSOHJequ96BLVyuJyGhqLOYx69_RqOPkGsGE9bHHa4cThiPITshI5YICEQS89NjH4lzctF1HwACkigbkWK_-36w68Kb5p1ujK_2u597Om2obVvr_Loxfku9pQ4b3FBfIdVYSI_UNr3WoXSqQrfffbVOKm-8sQ06qmxdy8I6OcyX5KyUdYdX_3VM3h7nr7NFsHx5ep5Nl4Hq__VBmjGFWhRJKZIQ0wgLnUmQOgs1Z5z3GTlEAmJQACwOyyyUcZxoGasSCqbDMbk53K1knbfOrKTb5laafDFd5oMGgrM0S-GT9d7bg1c523UOy-MCg3wgmQ8k8z-S4S9R92q0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>“Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Arnoud, Justine ; Peton, Hélène</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnoud, Justine ; Peton, Hélène</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract This article explores “doubting with” in collaborative management research. Extending methodological reflections on collaboration between researchers and practitioners, this article, drawing on the foundations of the pragmatist inquiry, stresses the central role of doubt and the doubtful situation in overcoming difficulties that are encountered in problem‐oriented approaches. We propose guidelines for “doubting with” in collaborative research, highlighting how it transforms modes of researcher–practitioner collaboration and the opportunities it provides to restore possibilities of action with a broader social dimension. We emphasize how “doubting with” addresses the challenges of collaboration and the key implications for management research regarding the importance of keeping doubt alive in our inquiries and of doubting with practitioners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-4754</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emre.12609</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><ispartof>European management review, 2023-09, Vol.21 (3), p.714-729</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-891ced4b7f473e85ebd9a0ad93d21223d2e2054060c00163f93a667da6cf0b1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,786,790,891,27957,27958</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-04218980$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnoud, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peton, Hélène</creatorcontrib><title>“Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration</title><title>European management review</title><description>Abstract This article explores “doubting with” in collaborative management research. Extending methodological reflections on collaboration between researchers and practitioners, this article, drawing on the foundations of the pragmatist inquiry, stresses the central role of doubt and the doubtful situation in overcoming difficulties that are encountered in problem‐oriented approaches. We propose guidelines for “doubting with” in collaborative research, highlighting how it transforms modes of researcher–practitioner collaboration and the opportunities it provides to restore possibilities of action with a broader social dimension. We emphasize how “doubting with” addresses the challenges of collaboration and the key implications for management research regarding the importance of keeping doubt alive in our inquiries and of doubting with practitioners.</description><subject>Humanities and Social Sciences</subject><issn>1740-4754</issn><issn>1740-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4QTegpQydpwXu6oUilSJDawjx54QozSOHJequ96BLVyuJyGhqLOYx69_RqOPkGsGE9bHHa4cThiPITshI5YICEQS89NjH4lzctF1HwACkigbkWK_-36w68Kb5p1ujK_2u597Om2obVvr_Loxfku9pQ4b3FBfIdVYSI_UNr3WoXSqQrfffbVOKm-8sQ06qmxdy8I6OcyX5KyUdYdX_3VM3h7nr7NFsHx5ep5Nl4Hq__VBmjGFWhRJKZIQ0wgLnUmQOgs1Z5z3GTlEAmJQACwOyyyUcZxoGasSCqbDMbk53K1knbfOrKTb5laafDFd5oMGgrM0S-GT9d7bg1c523UOy-MCg3wgmQ8k8z-S4S9R92q0</recordid><startdate>20230926</startdate><enddate>20230926</enddate><creator>Arnoud, Justine</creator><creator>Peton, Hélène</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>BXJBU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230926</creationdate><title>“Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration</title><author>Arnoud, Justine ; Peton, Hélène</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-891ced4b7f473e85ebd9a0ad93d21223d2e2054060c00163f93a667da6cf0b1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Humanities and Social Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnoud, Justine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peton, Hélène</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>HAL-SHS: Archive ouverte en Sciences de l'Homme et de la Société</collection><jtitle>European management review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnoud, Justine</au><au>Peton, Hélène</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>“Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration</atitle><jtitle>European management review</jtitle><date>2023-09-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>714</spage><epage>729</epage><pages>714-729</pages><issn>1740-4754</issn><eissn>1740-4762</eissn><abstract>Abstract This article explores “doubting with” in collaborative management research. Extending methodological reflections on collaboration between researchers and practitioners, this article, drawing on the foundations of the pragmatist inquiry, stresses the central role of doubt and the doubtful situation in overcoming difficulties that are encountered in problem‐oriented approaches. We propose guidelines for “doubting with” in collaborative research, highlighting how it transforms modes of researcher–practitioner collaboration and the opportunities it provides to restore possibilities of action with a broader social dimension. We emphasize how “doubting with” addresses the challenges of collaboration and the key implications for management research regarding the importance of keeping doubt alive in our inquiries and of doubting with practitioners.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/emre.12609</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-4754
ispartof European management review, 2023-09, Vol.21 (3), p.714-729
issn 1740-4754
1740-4762
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04218980v1
source Wiley
subjects Humanities and Social Sciences
title “Doubting with”: An opportunity to renew the debate on researcher–practitioner collaboration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-09-22T06%3A29%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%E2%80%9CDoubting%20with%E2%80%9D:%20An%20opportunity%20to%20renew%20the%20debate%20on%20researcher%E2%80%93practitioner%20collaboration&rft.jtitle=European%20management%20review&rft.au=Arnoud,%20Justine&rft.date=2023-09-26&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=714&rft.epage=729&rft.pages=714-729&rft.issn=1740-4754&rft.eissn=1740-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emre.12609&rft_dat=%3Chal_cross%3Eoai_HAL_hal_04218980v1%3C/hal_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-891ced4b7f473e85ebd9a0ad93d21223d2e2054060c00163f93a667da6cf0b1d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true