Evaluation of the contribution of 16 European beef production systems to food security

Livestock production, and more particularly ruminants, is criticized for its low conversion efficiency of natural resources into edible food. The objectives of this paper are to propose an evaluation of the contribution to food security of different European cattle farms through three criteria: 1) f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural systems 2021-05, Vol.190, p.103088, Article 103088
Main Authors: Mosnier, Claire, Jarousse, Anne, Madrange, Pauline, Balouzat, Jimmy, Guillier, Maëva, Pirlo, Giacomo, Mertens, Alexandre, ORiordan, Edward, Pahmeyer, Christoph, Hennart, Sylvain, Legein, Louise, Crosson, Paul, Kearney, Mark, Dimon, Philippe, Bertozzi, Carlo, Reding, Edouard, Iacurto, Miriam, Breen, James, Carè, Sara, Veysset, Patrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural sciences
Animal production studies
Beef production
European livestock
Feed food competition
Food engineering
Food security
Life Sciences
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Livestock production, and more particularly ruminants, is criticized for its low conversion efficiency of natural resources into edible food. The objectives of this paper are to propose an evaluation of the contribution to food security of different European cattle farms through three criteria: 1) food production assessed by the amount of human-edible protein (HEP) and energy (HEE) produced at farm level, 2) feed-food competition at the beef production scale estimated in terms of net human-edible protein and energy and in terms of land used, and 3) food affordability assessed by the production cost of meat, protein and energy. The analysis is based on 16 representative beef production systems in France, Belgium, Ireland, Italy and Germany and covers cow-calf systems, finishing systems, dairy and mixed dairy- finishing systems, with or without cash crops. The results show that, at the farm level, systems producing both beef and milk or cereals have higher HEP and HEE production per hectare (up to 370 kg of HEP and 60,000 106J.ha−1) than specialized beef systems (up to 50 kg of HEP and 1600 106J.ha−1) and have lower production costs (approximately €6 kg−1 of HEP in mixed beef system and €29 kg−1 of HEP in a specialized cow-calf-fattener system). Beef systems are almost all HEE net consumers. Results are more variable concerning net HEP efficiency. The cow-calf enterprises are mostly net producers of HEP but, in order to produce human edible meat, these systems need to be combined with finishing systems that are mostly net consumers of HEP. In most cases, cow-calf-finishing systems are net consumers of HEP (between 0.6 and 0.7) but grass-based systems using very little concentrates or systems using co-products not edible by humans are net HEP producers. The grass-based systems use more land area per kilogram of carcass but a major part of this area is non-tilled land, thus these systems are not in direct competition with human food production. The lowest meat production costs are the finishing systems producing the most live weight per livestock unit (LU) per year and dairy systems in lowland which share the costs between milk and meat. Although most of HEE and HEP efficient farms typically have higher meat production costs, some grassland based systems stand out positively for all indicators. These results pave the way for improvements of the contribution of beef production systems to food security. Net Human Edible Protein and Energy Efficiencies of meat pr
ISSN:0308-521X
1873-2267
DOI:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103088