Is the Principle of a Stable Heinrich Ratio a Myth?: A Multimethod Analysis

Background: Safety improvements are sometimes based on the premise that introducing measures to combat minor or no-harm incidents proportionately reduces the incidence of major incidents involving harm. This is in line with the principle of the Heinrich ratio, which asserts that there is a relativel...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Drug safety 2008-01, Vol.31 (8), p.637-642
Main Authors:	Gallivan, Steve, Taxis, Katja, Franklin, Bryony Dean, Barber, Nick
Format:	Article
Language:	eng
Subjects:	Accidents, Traffic - prevention & control Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data Biological and medical sciences Data Interpretation, Statistical Drug Safety and Pharmacovigilance Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment Humans Medical sciences Medication Errors - prevention & control Medication Errors - statistics & numerical data Medicine Medicine & Public Health Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...) Models, Statistical Pharmacology. Drug treatments Pharmacology/Toxicology Research Design Safety Management - methods Special Article
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Background: Safety improvements are sometimes based on the premise that introducing measures to combat minor or no-harm incidents proportionately reduces the incidence of major incidents involving harm. This is in line with the principle of the Heinrich ratio, which asserts that there is a relatively fixed ratio between the incidence of no-harm incidents, minor incidents and major incidents. This principle has been advocated as a means of targeting and evaluating new safety initiatives. Research Methodology: Both thought experimentation and analysis of empirical data were used to examine the plausibility of this principle. A descriptive statistical analysis was carried out using triangle plots to display the relative frequencies of the occurrence of safety incidents classified as minor, moderate or severe. Findings: Thought experiments indicated that the principle of a fixed Heinrich ratio has a dubious logical foundation. Analysis of emergency department attendance and studies of medication errors demonstrated marked variation in the relative ratios of different outcomes. Triangle plots of UK road traffic accident data revealed a hitherto unrecognized systematic pattern of change that contradicts the principle of the Heinrich ratio. Interpretation: This study of the principle of a fixed Heinrich ratio invalidates it: introducing measures to reduce the incidence of minor incidents will not inevitably reduce the incidence of major incidents pro rata. Any safety policies based on the assumption that the Heinrich ratio is true need to be rethought.
ISSN:	0114-5916 1179-1942